News
Tinubu, Defender Of The Fulani
By Abimbola Adelakun
This is, undoubtedly, a difficult time for Afenifere leader, Baba Reuben Fasoranti. He has suffered a grievous loss of his daughter, Funke Olakunrin, in untoward circumstances. The loss of one’s child is a painful and traumatic experience. My prayer for him and his family is to find strength at this trying time.
Now, the death of Mrs Olakunrin is bad enough; the politicisation of the grief is grossly unfair to the family of the deceased. We have always known that some of our leaders have bad manners, but this incident has further exposed them as lacking the ethic of charity. When the news of the death was first announced, the President’s media aide, Femi Adesina, hastily jumped on Twitter to say her killers were “those described as armed robbers by Ondo State Police Command.” Adesina cared little about the deceased; his obsession about roughening up the narrative was to preempt people’s angst that would be directed at his paymasters. If he cared about the poor woman and he respected the Fasoranti family, he would have hesitated and not tried to stuff words in the mouth of the police. The bereaved family not only have to contend with their pain, they also have to deal with the irritation of their daughter’s name being evoked each time we bring up the petty politics of shameless politicians who are using the sad incident to burnish their credentials as bona fide national leaders.
One of these Job’s comforters is the All Progressives Congress leader and former governor of Lagos State, Bola Tinubu, who answered some journalists’ questions during his visit to the Fasoranti family. First, he downplayed the circumstances of Olakunrin’s death by suggesting that she could have died in a road accident if it was duly fated. This line of reasoning is about one of the most uncharitable things one can say to the hearing of a bereaved family and, frankly, unbecoming of someone who wears the label of an elder. Such misspeaks bolster my conviction that the withdrawal of the permanent pass that some folk have awarded themselves as Yoruba leaders is long overdue for withdrawal. However manner Olakunrin might have died, the fact remains that she was killed and allegedly by herdsmen. To even overlook the circumstances of her death, sidestep the tense reactions by the exasperated populace, and begin to meander logic through bush paths is moral cowardice.
For a while now, Nigeria has been in a difficult situation because of the activities of killer herdsmen. Mind you, these herdsmen have been labelled as the fourth deadliest terrorist group in the world by the Global Terrorism Index. They have carried out massacres in rural and agrarian communities, and have been emboldened enough by the slackness of state security forces to move into urban settings. Tinubu only needs to go to rural areas in southwestern Nigeria, and his ears will be filled with stories of assault, kidnapping, and vicious murder. People are no longer at ease. They have lost their lives and entire investments in farming to the herdsmen menace. Those that have survived deadly encounters live in fear of the herdsmen. The fact that death is cheap in Nigeria does not mean we should refuse to label an issue for what it is. There is a context to the suspicion that Olakunrin might have been killed by herdsmen; why try to obfuscate matters by pointing out other ways she could have died? Why not just tell the bereaved you are sorry and go home?
The herdsmen nuisance got to the point that Adesina told Benue people to yield their land to their killers or continue to lose their lives. How can anyone look at all of these stories – including the “your land or your life” propositions to the poor hapless and undefended Nigerians – and merely shrug and say death could have come by a road accident anyway? We all know death is inevitable, but nobody throws their life outside the window for the fun of it. Otherwise, why does Tinubu himself travel with an armed escort and in a bulletproof vehicle too? Why can he not test his fate by stripping himself of the paraphernalia of defence and let’s see what happens?
While responding to the press, Tinubu tried to deflect, engaged in a rhetorical strategy called ‘whataboutism’ for no other discernable reason than not wanting to address the hippopotamus on his laps. The question at hand was the issue of insecurity – the kidnappings and killings by herdsmen – but somehow, he managed to drag in another issue entirely when he alluded to the alleged kidnapper, Evans, who was arrested a while ago. What has Evans’ kidnapping career got to do with herdsmen who did not even start their crimes with kidnapping but massacres and displacement of poor villagers whose farms they raided? Why stop at Evans when he could equally have raised other issues such as Pastor Biodun Fatoyinbo’s pending lawsuit and even climate change? He even threatened to give us a history of kidnapping to show us that what we are presently dealing with is an imitation of the criminal proclivity of southerners.
All of the above bring me to the point that baffled me most and which summarises all of the rhetorical acrobatics he did at the Fasoranti’s house: the needless defence of the Fulani by Tinubu. By now, everyone would have noticed that the most strident defence of the Fulani over the herdsmen issue has come from southerners, particularly the Yoruba. On the question of whether the Fulani deserve the stereotype of cold-blooded killers or not, the Yoruba people have wept louder than the bereaved. The Fulani themselves are an ethnic group with enough power to take over the media in their own defence, but they do not do so. Today, the Fulani are resented, and not just because of the herdsmen issue but also because of the clannishness and tribalism of President Muhammadu Buhari who has more or less driven collective benefits in the direction of a selected class. Why have they not refuted the narrative about them, considering that they have the necessary clout to challenge the demonising of their ethnic identity? They can use the airwaves and other media forms to vehemently denounce the herdsmen who attack undefended populations. They can rebuke Miyetti Allah group over their inflammatory statements, and also condemn the actions of reprobate groups such as the Coalition of Northern Groups who gave governors a 30-day ultimatum to enforce RUGA and students of Usman Dan Fodio University who insisted that RUGA must be established in all the 36 states of Nigeria.
They are so many crisis-management strategies the Fulani ethnic group can deploy to manage their image being battered all over Nigeria because of the spate of herdsmen attacks. If the Fulani themselves are not engaged in activities to refurbish their image, it is because they are too self-secure in their political power and privileges to be bothered about the long-term implications of ethnic stigmatisation. They probably also do not concern themselves so much with pushing back against stereotypes because their lackeys in the South run those errands on their behalf.
Tinubu, in rounding off the interview, made a rather curious statement cum question, “I don’t want to be political, but I will ask, where are the cows?” If by that he means that the crime of murder could not have been committed by herdsmen because there were no cows at the crime scene, it means he has reached the end of reasoning. I do not want to be political either, but the question of where the cows are has already been answered by none other than Tinubu himself. The cows are everywhere. If some people look into their mirror, they will find those cows staring back at them in all their bovine glory.
Credit:- PUNCH
![]()
Headline
Tinubu govt struggling with failure in security, economy, health, education – ADC
The African Democratic Congress, ADC, on Sunday said President Bola Tinubu’s administration is struggling under the weight of its failures.
ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said the Tinubu administration has failed in the areas of security, economy, healthcare, education and virtually every measure of human dignity.
Posting on X, Abdullahi said the current administration which has shown much disdain for Nigerians, has extended the same gesture to city abroad in search of better opportunities.
He wrote: “It is sad that this government, which has shown such disdain for everyday Nigerians that are struggling under the weight of its failures, has now chosen to extend that same disregard to honest Nigerians who have japa’d in search of better opportunities.
“A government that has failed, and continues to fail, on security, the economy, healthcare, education, and virtually every measure of human dignity has no business lying to Nigerians and the world that things are better for the Nigerians in Nigeria, than they are for Nigerians abroad.
“Until this government can guarantee safety, create jobs, restore economic stability, and inspire confidence at home, it should either fix Nigeria or stop lecturing Nigerians who have simply done what the government itself has failed to do: secured a better future for themselves and their families.
“For perspective, and a little bit of respect, Nigeria’s total oil export earnings in 2025 were US$31.5 billion, while official diaspora remittances for the same year amounted to US$21.8 billion.
![]()
Headline
‘Insensitive’, Atiku Slams FG’s Proposed ₦50,000 WAEC, NECO Fees
Former Vice President and Presidential Candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, has strongly criticised the Federal Government over what he described as a steady increase in the cost of public education, warning that the latest measures could deepen Nigeria’s education crisis and deny millions of children access to learning.
Reacting to the reported approval of a uniform ₦50,000 examination fee for candidates sitting the West African Senior School Certificate Examination (WAEC) and the National Examinations Council (NECO) examinations from 2027, alongside the recent increase in fees charged by Federal Unity Colleges, Atiku said the decisions would place an unbearable financial burden on Nigerian families already grappling with severe economic hardship.
In a statement issued on Sunday by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, the former vice president argued that education should remain affordable regardless of prevailing economic conditions, insisting that governments have a responsibility to remove barriers to learning rather than create new ones.
According to him, the proposed examination fee and the rising cost of Unity School education come at a time when many households are struggling to cope with rising inflation, increasing food prices, higher transportation costs, electricity tariff adjustments, unemployment and declining purchasing power.
He maintained that asking parents to shoulder additional education expenses under such conditions would inevitably force many families into difficult choices between providing food, healthcare and education for their children.
Atiku stressed that education remains one of the most effective tools for reducing poverty and promoting social mobility, warning that policies which make schooling more expensive ultimately undermine the country’s long-term development.
He argued that every additional financial obligation placed on parents translates into more children dropping out of school or abandoning their educational aspirations altogether.
The former vice president expressed concern that the latest policy direction could worsen Nigeria’s already troubling out-of-school children statistics, noting that the country continues to rank among those with the highest number of children excluded from formal education globally.
According to him, available estimates place the number of out-of-school Nigerian children and young people between about 10.5 million and 15 million, depending on the methodology and age bracket used.
He said rather than introducing policies that could increase those figures, government should be aggressively investing in programmes capable of returning children to classrooms and expanding educational opportunities across the country.
Atiku further argued that the proposed increase in WAEC and NECO fees would disproportionately affect children from poor and middle-income homes, many of whom already struggle to pay existing school charges.
He warned that the policy could become another obstacle preventing academically qualified students from progressing to tertiary education, insisting that many brilliant students may never get the opportunity to compete for university admission simply because they cannot afford the cost of qualifying examinations.
The ADC presidential candidate also linked the issue to what he described as the broader structural challenges confronting Nigeria’s higher education system.
He noted that although more than two million candidates seek admission into Nigerian universities every year, existing institutions collectively admit only between 500,000 and 700,000 students annually due to limited infrastructure and inadequate carrying capacity.
According to him, the result is that more than one million qualified applicants are denied admission every year, not because they failed to meet academic requirements, but because there are insufficient spaces available.
He argued that instead of addressing this challenge by expanding lecture theatres, laboratories, hostels, libraries and other critical infrastructure within public universities, the government was introducing additional financial barriers that would prevent many students from even reaching the admission stage.
Atiku described the situation as a “double burden” on young Nigerians, saying millions already face limited admission opportunities while many others may now be unable to afford the examinations required to qualify for admission.
He also questioned what he called the contradiction between the government’s education financing policies and its promotion of the Nigerian Education Loan Fund (NELFUND).
According to him, education loans cannot solve the challenges confronting students who are unable to complete secondary education or pay for qualifying examinations in the first place.
He argued that meaningful education reforms should begin with making education affordable at the primary and secondary school levels while simultaneously expanding tertiary education infrastructure to accommodate growing demand.
The former vice president maintained that education should never become another avenue through which citizens bear the consequences of economic policies, insisting that countries seeking sustainable economic growth invest more heavily in education during difficult periods rather than shifting additional costs to families.
He further contended that the cumulative effect of rising food prices, transportation costs, electricity bills, healthcare expenses and increasing education fees places ordinary Nigerians under enormous financial pressure.
According to him, reforms implemented without adequate consideration for their social impact ultimately become punitive rather than developmental.
Atiku therefore called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to reverse both the increase in Unity School fees and the proposed ₦50,000 WAEC and NECO examination fee.
He also urged the Federal Government to convene a broad-based stakeholders’ dialogue aimed at developing sustainable funding models for public education.
In addition, he advocated increased investment in public schools, improved educational infrastructure, recruitment of more qualified teachers, expansion of university admission capacity and policies that guarantee equal access to education irrespective of a child’s economic background.
The former vice president reaffirmed the commitment of the African Democratic Congress to policies that promote affordable and accessible education, saying an ADC-led administration would prioritise expanding opportunities for Nigerian children and ensure that poverty does not prevent deserving students from acquiring quality education
![]()
Headline
Bello Turji, Ado Aleru should be eliminated like Kachalla – Shehu Sani
Former Kaduna Central Senator, Shehu Sani, has disclosed that bandit leaders, Bello Turji and Ado Aleru, should be eliminated the same way Zamfara bandit leader, Yellow Kachalla was killed.
Sani said the elimination of Kachalla is a major victory in the fight against terrorism in Northern Nigeria.
Posting on X, he wrote: “The news of the extermination of the infamous and notorious Zamfara bandit leader “Yellow” by Nigerian security forces is a major victory in the fight against terrorism in the North Western part of the country.
“Similar fate should await the likes of Bello Turji and Ado Aleru.”
Kachalla’s killing marked the end of the reign of a feared warlord long linked to deadly attacks, mass kidnappings, cattle rustling and violent raids across communities in Nigeria’s North-West.
He was shot dead on Friday at Dan Jibga Market in Anka Local Government Area of Zamfara State by armed men believed to be loyal to rival bandit kingpin, Dogo Gide.
Kachalla was widely regarded as one of the most influential bandit commanders operating within the forests spanning Anka, Bukkuyum, Maru and neighbouring local government areas of Zamfara State.
![]()
-
Entertainment5 years agoBBNaija: “Shameful For A Married Woman” – Boma, Tega Doing ‘Stuff’ Under Duvet Sparks Outrage (See Video)
-
Entertainment4 years agoSinger, Oxlade In Big Mess After His Sex Tape With A Strange Lady Surfaces Online (Watch Video)
-
Entertainment6 years agoBBNaija: Kiddwaya Sucks Erica’s Boobs, Licks Dorathy’s Neck In Truth Or Dare Game (Video)
-
Entertainment3 years agoI’m Not Ashamed Of My Leaked Nude Photos, Ifunanya Confesses (See Photos)
-
Crime1 year agoNDLEA intercepts Saudi, UK-bound cocaine in lipsticks
-
Entertainment6 years agoI’m Not Sick But Only Lost Some Weight – Kiss Daniel
-
Crime1 year agoNDLEA seizes N3.4bn worth of opioids in Lagos, PH, uncovers drugs in chocolate tins
-
Entertainment5 years agoHow Women Should Act During Sex – Actress, Blessing Okoro Reveals (Vdeo)



