Connect with us

Headline

Judge Sets March 4 Date For Historic Trump Trial

Published

on

A federal judge on Monday set a date of March 4, 2024, for Donald Trump’s election subversion conspiracy trial — placing one of the biggest criminal cases in American history at peak election season.

The date is the day before “Super Tuesday,” when more than a dozen states vote in the Republican primary contest to pick the party’s candidate for the 2024 election — with Trump the firm favorite to secure the nomination.

Special counsel Jack Smith had asked for the trial of the 45th US president to begin on January 2, while Trump’s attorneys countered with a proposed date of April 2026 — 17 months after the election.

“Setting a trial date does not depend on the defendant’s professional obligations so Mr Trump will have to make a date work,” US District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan said after admonishing the defense that a two-year delay was too long.

The decision could have a pivotal impact on Trump’s hopes of recapturing the White House.

He took to his social network, Truth Social, to demand that the case be dismissed, calling Smith “deranged” and accusing President Joe Biden of sowing “division, anger, and hatred.”

“It will only get worse because these deranged lunatics know no bounds. Someday, however, Sanity will again prevail,” he posted as Chutkan began hearing arguments at a federal courthouse in Washington.

Trump pleaded not guilty to the charges in an early August court appearance and was not required to attend Monday’s procedural hearing.

The 77-year-old has been slapped with four criminal indictments this year — twice by Smith and once each by state prosecutors in New York and Georgia.

But the case before Chutkan may pose the greatest legal peril to Trump — particularly if it ends up being the first of what is shaping up to be a busy legal calendar for the former president.

“President Trump is not your average person. He’s incredibly intelligent and he knows the ropes,” his lawyer Alina Habba told “Fox News Sunday” when asked how her client would prepare for his upcoming trials.

“He also knows the facts because he lived them.”

Trump is to go on trial in New York later in March on charges of paying election-eve hush money to a porn star, and in Florida in May for allegedly mishandling top secret government documents.

Trump and 18 co-defendants also face racketeering charges in Georgia over their efforts to overturn the 2020 election result in the southern state.

The judge presiding over the Georgia case has not yet set a firm date for that trial to begin.

The case before Chutkan accuses Trump of conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding — the January 6, 2021 joint session of Congress that was attacked by a mob of Trump supporters.

Trump, the sole defendant in this indictment, is also accused of seeking to disenfranchise American voters with his false claims he won the 2020 election.

Whit Ayres, a veteran political consultant, said that if Trump, who enjoys a commanding lead over the Republican 2024 field, is acquitted in his first trial he would be all but certain to win the party’s presidential nomination.

“I don’t know any way you’d stop him,” he said in an online interview.

“But if he gets convicted of a serious felony charge, I don’t know how people would react to that, because we’ve never had anything remotely close to a similar situation,” the Republican pollster added.

“I’d have to think that a serious felony charge, maybe coupled with some prison time, would at least cause some people to rethink their support.”

The 61-year-old Chutkan, who was appointed by former Democratic president Barack Obama, has handed down some of the stiffest sentences to participants in the attack on the US Capitol, and Trump has accused her of being “highly partisan” and “very biased.”

Chutkan also has a legal history with Trump — she ruled against him in a November 2021 case, notably declaring that “presidents are not kings.”

Loading

Headline

US Embassy, Consulate To Close Monday For Presidents’ Day

Published

on

The United States will temporarily shuts its Embassy in Abuja and the Consulate General in Lagos on Monday, 17 February 2025, in observance of Presidents’ Day.

This was disclosed in a post on X by the diplomatic mission.

It assured the public that normal operations would resume the following day.

“The U.S. Embassy in Abuja and the Consulate General in Lagos will be closed on Monday, February 17, 2025, in observance of Presidents’ Day. We will resume normal operations on Tuesday, 18 February 2025,” the mission said.

The Presidents’ Day is observed in the United States annually on the third Monday of February to honour past and present leaders of the nation.

Although essential services will remain accessible through emergency contact channels, routine consular services will resume after the holiday.

Nigerians seeking U.S. visas or consular assistance are advised to plan their visits accordingly.

Loading

Continue Reading

Headline

Alleged ₦96bn Fraud: Edo Panel Indicts Obaseki, Impeached LG Chairmen

Published

on

Edo State Governor, Monday Okpebholo, receives the report from the Administrative Panel of Enquiry set up to investigate the financial dealings of the impeached 18 Local Government Chairmen in the state.


Edo State Governor, Monday Okpebholo, has received the report of the Administrative Panel of Enquiry set up on the 18th of December, 2024 to investigate the financial dealings of the impeached 18 Local Government Chairmen in Edo State from 4th September, 2023 to November, 2024 and has vowed to petition the EFCC over its findings.

The Chief Press Secretary to the Governor, Fred Itua, disclosed this in a statement on Sunday.

He said the Chairman of the panel, Solomon Imohiosen, while submitting the report and recommendations to Governor Okpebholo over the weekend disclosed that findings and forensic investigations uncovered that huge sums amounting to ₦96 billion were either mismanaged and/or diverted to private accounts.

“The panel’s investigation uncovered significant irregularities in the financial activities of the 18 Local Governments Councils. The recommendations outlined in the report aim to address these issues and promote transparency and accountability in the Local Governments finances,” Imohiosen said.

According to the statement, the panel observed that ₦95 billion was received from the Joint Allocation Account Committee (JAAC) by the 18 Local Government Area Chairmen for the period investigated. It, however, reported that the funds were not judiciously utilized as no meaningful projects were on the ground to justify the amount received.

The panel reportedly confirmed fraudulent diversion of Local Government funds to political godfathers in the State, alleging that over ₦10 billion was fraudulently siphoned, using the psudo name, “Security, Environment and Training.

The report is said to claim that the 18 Local Government Area Chairmen contributed to the account, which was used as a conduit pipe to drain government resources, as money were transferred from there to various individuals and companies.

Besides the impeached Local Government Chairmen who were reportedly indicted by the report, former governor Godwin Obaseki, and leaders of the factional Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), among others, were also allegedly fingered.

Loading

Continue Reading

Headline

‘Taxes And More Taxes On Over­burdened Masses’, Nigerians Fault CBN’s Decision To Impose Minimum Charge On ATM Transactions

Published

on

By Augustine Akhilomen

Nigerians have questioned the decision of the Central Bank of Nigeria boss, Olayemi Cardoso, to impose a mini­mum charge of N100 for ATM transactions exceeding N20,000, which is expected to take effect from March 1st, 2025.

Under the revised fee struc­ture, withdrawals from one’s bank ATMs will remain free of charge.

However, customers using ATMs of other banks will be subjected to a charge of N100 per withdrawal of N20,000 or less at on-site ATMs, which are located within or directly affiliated with a bank branch.

Off-site ATMs, which are po­sitioned outside bank premises such as shopping malls, fuel sta­tions, and other public spaces, will attract an additional sur­charge of up to N500 per trans­action.

However, such policies have angered some Nigerians who believe that President Bola Tinubu has increased the burden of the masses with such policies.

Meanwhile, bishop Herbert Ekechukwu, a cleric and economist, recount­ed: “This new policy is expected to take effect from March 1, 2025. Another bank ATM will attract N100 levy, plus additional sur­charge of up to N500 per N20,000.”

“Taxes and more taxes on over­burdened masses. The average Nigerian is struggling to make a living.

“They are already encum­bered with super runaway in­flation. To suffocate them again with more taxes shows a high level of insensitivity by the elite ruling class.

“Not quite long, we discussed the proposed increase of telecom tariff and now this.

“I remember many years ago when Military President Ibrahim Babangida was putting Nigerians under great affliction with the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP).

“General Olusegun Obasanjo warned that SAP should have a human face. I do not see this gov­ernment having a human face.

“Please, let us think outside the box to grow this economy. Taxation is not the only way to grow the economy.

“Let us look at other options available without putting more stress on the already suffering masses.

“Let our emphasis shift to youth empowerment, agricul­ture and rural industry, quality education, etc.

“Taxation is necessary, but people’s welfare is of utmost im­portance.”

Also, Tola Oresanwo, an activist and public affairs analyst, said, “It portrays this administra­tion as one that is insensitive, unresponsive and callous.

“The weight of the burden being placed on the common man in the country is becoming unbearable day by day.

“Although the CBN attributes this review to rising operational costs and the need to enhance the efficiency of ATM services in Nigeria’s banking industry, I want to disagree with that notion because going by the huge profits after tax being declared by these commercial banks, year in, year out, there is no basis whatsoever for an upward review of the ATM transaction charges.

“The increased fees may discourage the use of banking services, especially among low income earners who may see the upward review as a means of cheating or shortchanging them, and this move could negatively impact the CBN’s financial inclu­sion campaign.”

In the same vein, Utase Joseph Utase, a consul­tant, stated: “The new CBN poli­cy imposing a minimum charge of N100 per N20,000 withdrawn from other banks’ ATMs will sig­nificantly impact on everyday Nigerians.

“Many rely on ATMs for cash transactions, especially in areas with limited banking services.

“This additional cost could strain low income earners who frequently use ATMs for small withdrawals.

“It may also discourage cash transactions, pushing more peo­ple toward digital banking.

“However, for those with lim­ited access to mobile banking, it could lead to frustration and increased financial burden.

“Ultimately, while the policy may benefit banks operationally, it adds another expense for regu­lar Nigerians.”

Loading

Continue Reading

Recent Posts




JOIN US ON FACEBOOK

Trending