Connect with us

Headline

Electoral Act: Future Elections Should Be Better Than Previous Ones — PDP Spokesman

Published

on

……As Abaribe Insists Senate Approved Electronic Transmission Of Election Results

The National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Ini Ememobong, has said that future elections in Nigeria should be better than previous ones.

Ememobong made the remark on Thursday during an interview on Channels Television’s The Morning Brief.

He said only 26 per cent of registered voters participated in the last election, a development he described as evidence of significant voter apathy.

According to him, “The idea of democratic consolidation means that every election, every future election, should be better than the previous one in every material respect.”

He noted that the Supreme Court, in its judgment, had identified lacuna in the electoral process and returned the matter to the National Assembly, stressing that it was now the primary duty of lawmakers to legislate appropriately for the administration of the country.

“If the Supreme Court in its judgment has identified the lacuna and passed the ball back to the National Assembly, the most primary duty is to legislate for the administration of this country,” he said.

His comments followed a proposed bill by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) seeking to mandate the electronic transmission of election results.

Ememobong warned against taking Nigerians for granted, describing them as patient people whose tolerance should not be abused.

“Nigerians are very patient people. You push them to the wall, they begin to make a hole in the wall, but somehow their minds change and you find them coming out straight for you. It happened during the End SARS,” he said.

He appealed to legislators and the political class to take the issue seriously, describing the proposed amendment as one Nigerians have been waiting for.

“My appeal is that the legislators, and in fact the entire political class, should not take Nigerians for granted. This is the one bill, law and Act Nigerians have been waiting for in this period,” he said.

Speaking further, Ememobong warned that sustained disregard for electoral integrity could have grave consequences.

“If Nigerians are pushed to the point where there is a mass protest, I’m not sure when a mass protest over lack of electoral sanctity aligns with insecurity and hunger, there will be a conflagration that will be beyond the capacity of any government and security agencies to contain,” he said.

Meanwhile, Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe has insisted that the Senate approved the electronic transmission of election results in real time, dismissing media reports suggesting otherwise and saying his integrity is at stake over the issue.

Speaking at a media briefing at the National Assembly on Thursday, accompanied by 13 serving senators, Abaribe asserted that the Senate did not pass the “transfer” of results as contained in the 2022 Electoral Act, but rather approved the electronic transmission of results, stressing that the distinction is deliberate and important.

“I am concerned about reports in the media, and that is why we decided to make this clarification. What we passed is electronic transmission of results. I need to make this very clear,” he said.

Abaribe explained that the Senate’s decision followed an extensive legislative process involving consultations with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and civil society organisations (CSOs).

According to him, a joint committee of the National Assembly held several retreats with the stakeholders, after which there was a consensus that electronic transmission of results should be adopted by both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

He added that the Senate subsequently set up an ad hoc committee to review the electoral reform report.

“That report was considered during a closed-door session. I can assure you, on my honour, that during the executive session we all agreed on electronic transmission of results in real time. At plenary yesterday, we also passed it,” he said.

Abaribe said the controversy arose during the plenary session, despite confirmation by the Senate President on the floor that electronic transmission of results had been approved.

He noted that although the Senate adjourned after plenary, it has not yet adopted the Votes and Proceedings, which he described as a necessary procedural step before the conference committee can meet to harmonise the Senate and House versions of the bill.

“There is still one more step left for the Senate to take. Until the Votes and Proceedings are adopted, the conference committee cannot take place. Either the House or the Senate version has to be adopted. A huge number of senators across party lines are with us,” he said.

Also speaking at the briefing, Senator Aliyu Ningi said the process began as far back as 2024 and involved extensive deliberations.

“We had about 27 different sessions as a committee. Some of us find this very painful, that public opinion is being pushed in a negative direction despite the work that has been done,” Ningi said.

Both senators emphasised that the legislative process has not ended and that harmonisation cannot occur until the outstanding procedural steps are completed.

Clarifying the terminology, Abaribe said the Senate deliberately chose the word “transmission” rather than “transfer” to avoid ambiguity.

“What is in the 2022 Act is ‘transfer’. We do not want a law that is vague or ambiguous. What we passed is electronic ‘transmission’ of results,” he said.

However, during the clause-by-clause consideration, the Senate expunged the word “transmission” from the amendment and replaced it with the word “transfer,” as contained in the existing Act.

The proposal by the Senate Chief Whip was swiftly seconded by the Deputy Senate President and immediately adopted.

In what appeared contradictory during the debate the Senate Chief Whip, Senator Tahir Mongunu, pointed to the exact wording of the law and urged the chamber to retain the term “transfer” as provided in the 2022 Electoral Act.

His position was backed by Deputy Senate President Jibrin Barau, prompting Senate President Godswill Akpabio to strike the gavel and affirm the retention of the existing provision.

Loading

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Headline

BREAKING: FG Files Criminal Charges Against El-Rufai Over Alleged Interception of NSA Ribadu’s Phone

Published

on

The Federal Government of Nigeria has filed criminal charges against former Kaduna State Governor, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, over the alleged unlawful interception of the phone communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu.

Court documents show that the case was instituted at the Federal High Court in Abuja, with the Federal Republic of Nigeria listed as the complainant and El-Rufai named as the sole defendant.

The charges reportedly stem from remarks made by the former governor during a live television appearance last Friday. According to the charge sheet obtained by Spear News Nigeria, the case is marked FHC/ABJ/CR/99/2026 and contains a three-count charge.

2

Court documents showed that El-Rufai, 65, appeared as a guest on Arise TV’s Prime Time Programme on Feb. 13, 2026, where he reportedly admitted to involvement in the interception and to knowing individuals who carried out the act without reporting them to security agencies.

3

The charges, filed under TABU DET CR/99/2026, include: Count One, Allegedly admitting during the television interview that he and his associates unlawfully intercepted the phone communications of the National Security Adviser, contrary to Section 12 (1) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Amendment Act, 2024.

Count Two, Allegedly stating that he knew individuals who unlawfully intercepted the same communications but failed to report them, in violation of Section 27(b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Amendment Act, 2024. Count Three, Allegedly using technical systems to compromise public safety and national security, and instilling apprehension among Nigerians, in breach of Section 131(2) of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003.

The case, filed by a team of Federal Government lawyers led by ME Ernest, OM Owan, UM Bulla, CS Eze, and VE G. Orubor, is set to proceed with investigations and trial proceedings.

Authorities said the matter falls under the jurisdiction of the Abuja Judicial Division of the Federal High Court, where the accused will be required to respond to the charges.

The trial is expected to attract significant public attention given the high-profile nature of the accused and the sensitive security issues involved.

Loading

Continue Reading

Headline

Breaking: Protesters gather as El-Rufai arrives EFCC headquarters

Published

on

Former Governor of Kaduna State, Nasiru El-Rufai has honoured the invitation of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.

The chieftain of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, was earlier invited for questioning over alleged corruption linked to his administration.

He arrived the EFCC headquarters with hundreds of his supporters.


Recall that the former governor refused arrest at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on Thursday last week.

In a series of interviews granted after the airport drama, El-Rufai accused the National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu of orchestrating the attempted arrest.

Loading

Continue Reading

Headline

Sanwo-Olu Appoints Ogunsanwo as LASU’s 6th Chancellor

Published

on

The Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, has appointed His Royal Majesty, Oba (Dr) Olufolarin Olukayode Ogunsanwo, the Alara of Ilara, as the new and 6th Chancellor of Lagos State University (LASU), ushering in a new era of leadership for the institution.

This appointment, according to a statement signed on Sunday, 15th February 2026, by the Registrar and Secretary to Council, Mr Emmanuel Fanu, follows the completion of the tenure of Professor Gbolahan Elias, who served meritoriously as the 5th Chancellor of the university.

According to the statement, the new Chancellor’s appointment takes effect from Friday, February 13, 2026, for a single term of five years, renewable once.

“The appointment is made pursuant to the provisions of the Lagos State University Law 2004 (As amended), Chapter L69, Volume 7, Schedule 1, which empowers the Visitor to appoint the Chancellor of the University.

“His Majesty’s appointment is for a single term of Five years, effective from Friday, 13th February 2026, and is renewable once.

“The Pro-Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor warmly congratulate HRM Oba (Dr) Olufolarin Olukayode Ogunsanwo on this distinguished appointment and look forward to his impactful leadership in advancing the vision and mission of Lagos State University.”

Oba Ogunsanwo, a respected traditional ruler and accomplished scholar, brings to the role decades of leadership experience, academic exposure, and community service. His selection is seen as a strategic move aimed at leveraging his wealth of knowledge and influence to further position LASU as a leading centre of excellence in teaching, research, and innovation.

LASU Pro-Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor warmly congratulate HRM, Oba Ogunsanwo on this distinguished appointment, and look forward to his impactful leadership in advancing the vision and mission of Lagos State University.

Loading

Continue Reading

Recent Posts

 


<im




JOIN US ON FACEBOOK

Trending