Connect with us

Headline

Thepledge Big Story: Anger, Rage, Follow New DSTV Price Adjustment

Published

on

By Augustine Akhilomen

Many Nigerians were angry last week after MultiChoice Nigeria, owners of DSTV and Gotv again announced plans to increase its subscription rates.

With no strong competition to rival the South African company, MultiChoice, has become a real pain in the neck of many of their subscribers in Nigeria with their yearly price changes of their packages.

Recall that Telcom Satellite Television (TSTV) isn’t the first Nigeria-owned company that’s tried to test DStv’s hold on the Nigerian market. Back in 2007, newly-launched HiTV beat DStv to EPL rights and looked to build its subscriber base using football as its crown jewel. But that proved inadequate as, with much of its other content considered second-rate, many Nigerians maintained their DStv subscriptions. By 2011, HiTV had closed shop amid allegations of high-level mismanagement.


At the height of Multichoice dominance in 2007, Nigerians paid N9,000 per month for the premium bouquet, prompting public outcry of exploitation from Nigerians and government officials.


Several local competitors like MyTv, Daarsat, Consaat, Kwese TV, TStv and several others were supported by the government to help end Multichoice dominance. But all the interventions ended in vain as none was able to upstage the market leader.

However, with MultiChoice new price packages already in full effect on May 1, the new regime would also see the price on the Compact+ bouquet move to N16,600 from N14, 250 monthly. Subscribers on the Compact bouquet would, under the new price regime, pay N10,500 as against N9,000, with those on Confam set to pay N6,200 as against N5,300.

Those on DStv Yanga and Padi would pay N3,500 and N2,500 respectively as against N2,950 and N2,150. On the GOtv service, subscribers on GOtv Supa package would pay N6,400 as against N5,500, with those on GOtv Max paying N4,850 as against N4,150.

GOtv Jolli subscribers are due to start paying N3,300 as against N2,800, with the tariffs on GOtv Jinja and GOtv Lite also rising from N1,900 to N2,250 and N900 to N1,100 respectively.

Expectedly, however, this new development has not gone down well with some MultiChoice dealers and agents, who believe the company is taking advantage of Nigerians. Some subscribers, indeed, expressed dissatisfaction with the increased cost of the service, especially in light of the current economic situation in the country.


They argued that the new rates are too high and may not be affordable for many Nigerians, particularly those on low incomes.

Last year, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission sought for clarity after they reviewed their prices. The Executive Chairman of FCCPC, Babatunde Irukera said, “Although we cannot, and did not regulate price except in limited circumstances requiring presidential approval and gazetting. As such, our order to MultiChoice did not prevent them from pricing their services in a manner acceptable between them and their subscribers.

“We regulate price gouging. The nature of gouging is post-fact, meaning that when a price movement occurs, we can investigate to determine if it is excessive, exploitative, unrestored or manifestly unjust.”

But it appears MultiChoice are not affected by the cries and reservations expressed by most Nigerians. And the Federal Government has not done enough to halt the excessive increment of their packages.

Meanwhile, the subscribers, acting under the aegis of Association of Telephone, Cable Tv and Internet Subscribers of Nigeria (ATCIS-Nigeria), had said they will reject any hike at this time.


ATCIS-Nigeria President, Sina Bilesanmi said he will not be surprised if the hike is extended to the Nigerian market, adding that the body will resist it. “Yes, we are aware of the South African hike and know that it is a sign of what will happen in Nigeria. They will hide under the guise of spiraling inflation and others to hike tariffs. But we have always pushed for pay-per-view.

“And if they say they do not have the technology or precedent globally to implement that template, they should think about a technology that allows us to retain our subscription when we don’t use it. I mean for instance, if I subscribe and I am unable to use my subscription either because I am not around or I do not have cash to fuel my generator, I should be able to use it or roll it over when I subscribe again,” Bilesanmi said.

Also opposing the subscription hike, the National Association of Nigerian Students, (NANS) said the South African company was extorting Nigerians without considering their standard of living.


NANS therefore gave MultiChoice Nigeria, a seven-day ultimatum to reverse its planned hike on DSTV and GOTV subscription rates.

“Today, we are aware that Multi Choice Digital Satellite has increased its tariffs without considering the standard of living of Nigerians. We have also waited for long to see if this same company will dance to the music of Nigerians who have been clamouring for ‘pay-as-you-view’ tariff, but the reverse is the case.


“This is the time to call on the National Broadcasting Commission to go back to the Commission’s act to regulate the ownership, activities and operations of Direct Broadcast Satellite Service Providers. DSTV is one of the leading direct-to-home service providers in Nigeria since its inception of operation from as far back as 1995, and has also made a lot of profit with over 25 million subscribers which is the largest market for its operations.


“We want the Federal Government to stampede their proposed plan in tariffs increment and also force them to implement the pay-as-you-view system. We are aware that DSTV operates a system of pay-as-you-go tariffs in other countries,” NANS declared.


Even so, some Nigerians also condemned the new rates in their posts on their social media platforms.


They said that it would amount to ripping them off of their hard earned money as well as wondered what was responsible for the sudden increase.

Twitter name Mazi Ubadire says, “I just saw a message on my DStv explora about an upgrade of subscription from high to higher.

“What is the rationale behind this increment of subscription fees on DStv, the company needs to explain, “he tweeted.

“These DStv guys are not ready to do business. After showing the same programmes repeatedly till the subscriber gets tired, they are increasing their subscriptions, “ Akinlade tweeted.


Abiodun Bukola said, “DStv has increased the price for premium again. These guys are bold.


“The question we must ask DStv is how come they cannot change their subscriptions to Pay as you use?


“If not for the football channels my husband watches, I would have thrown that decoder in the bin, “she said.

Olamipekun Adeshina tweets, “DStv has increased their subscription again, why are these people ripping us off like this and more importantly, why are we quiet? This madness has to stop.

“@shyboyeddie stated, “Don’t even have a problem with DSTV increasing their prices.. It’s the content stagnation that irritates me. Besides Football, News and Music, it’s the same dead movies they keep repeating, even documentaries and reality shows are old. And you have to pay for showmax again.”

@realgodfada46 stated, “This is entirely ridiculous. How on earth are they doing this now they know Nigerians are struggling? They have the boldness to write “Nigeria only” Does anyone have alternatives to DSTV I can’t pay 10k 5H hundred when I am struggling with 9k every month. This is exploitation.”


@realgodfada46 wrote, “This is entirely ridiculous. How on earth are they doing this now they know Nigerians are struggling? They have the boldness to write “Nigeria only” Does anyone have alternatives to DSTV I can’t pay 10k 5H hundred when I am struggling with 9k every month. This is exploitation.”


@RemiOdewale stated, “Now that we have zero Live sporting event on

@DStvNg. It’s high time @MultiChoice crashes the bouquet tarrif. Why still paying so much for nothing?”


@KujojiAnthony wrote, “@gotv @multichoice U guys are just extorting us in this country..U increase ur tariff from 1,900 to 2,400 which we didn’t complain much about..Now u reduced the channels..No more CH 34 where we watch la liga..No more CH67 for cartoons. What is d increment for?”

For sure, it’s unlikely that the argument of the company that their decision to hike the price was as a result of the rise in the cost of production would convince many Nigerians, many of whom are already feeling the pain and burden of rising cost of living.

One thing is for sure however, that it’s only a matter of time before the people will force the government to act and checkmate the excesses of this monopoly. Nigerians are also not hiding their disposition to the emergence of a rival company to compete with Multichoice so as to reduce its hold on the jocular of Nigerians.

Loading

Headline

Security Beefed Up At INEC Office In Osun Ahead Of Gov Election

Published

on

As Osun State prepares for Saturday’s governorship election, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) office along the Gbongan-Ibadan Road in Osogbo has become a hive of activity, with a heightened security presence.

Our correspondent sighted security agents in large numbers on the premises of INEC, including personnel of the Nigeria Police Force.

Preparations are being intensified for their deployment across the 30 local government areas of the state.

Election stakeholders are also present at the office ahead of the exercise.

They include civil society organisations, journalists and election observers.

The Resident Electoral Commissioner, Oluwatoyin Babalola, is said to be meeting with National Commissioners and supporting RECs from other states as final arrangements for the election are being concluded.

The election will be held in 3,763 polling units across 332 wards in the 30 local government areas of the state.

INEC had on Thursday said that over 1.9 million permanent voter cards (PVCs) were collected for the Osun governorship election.

INEC’s National Commissioner, Chairman, Information and Voter Education Committee, Mohammed Haruna, in a statement, said the number was derived from the total of 2,339,233 registered voters in the State.

“Out of the total of 2,339,233 registered voters in the State, 1,906,390 PVCs, representing 81.50 per cent, have been collected. The remaining 426,842 PVCs, representing 18.50 per cent, have been safely deposited with the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), in line with the Commission’s established practice.

“Similarly, it should be noted that some persons with damaged, defaced, or lost PVCs applied for replacement of their cards. A total of 6,101 among those who applied printed downloadable copies of their PVCs,” the Commission said.

Loading

Continue Reading

Headline

Amnesty initiates online petition against Fadahunsi over ‘kill Accord’ comment

Published

on

Amnesty International Nigeria has invited Nigerians to sign an online petition calling for action over comments attributed to Senator Francis Fadahunsi ahead of Saturday’s Osun State governorship election.

The organisation made the call on Friday in a series of posts on its official X account.

Amnesty said the petition was aimed at ensuring that Fadahunsi, who represents Osun East Senatorial District, faces justice over the remarks, which it described as inciting violence.

“Online petition to ensure that Sen. Francis Adenigba Fadahunsi face justice for inciting violence ahead of Osun election is ready! You can sign here,” Amnesty said.

The human rights organisation also stressed the need to protect the rights of Osun residents to participate freely in the election.

“The human rights of the people of Osun state must be upheld and protected. People must be free to vote — without anything or anyone undermining their right to make political choices,” it said.

Amnesty further called on the Nigeria Police Force and the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to investigate the remarks attributed to Fadahunsi.


“Allegations of incitement to violence ahead of the Osun election require urgent action. We call for a prompt, impartial and thorough investigation into the reported remarks attributed to Senator Francis Fadahunsi and accountability where the evidence establishes a criminal offence.

“Political differences must never become a justification for violence,” it added.

The development follows a video that circulated on social media earlier in the week, showing Fadahunsi addressing supporters in Ilesa ahead of Saturday’s election.

The senator was heard speaking in Yoruba in remarks that were interpreted as a threat against members of the Accord Party.

Following the backlash, Fadahunsi, through his media office, clarified that he was referring to defeating the Accord Party with votes and not physically attacking its members.

In a statement titled “Kill Osun Accord with Votes, Not Violence, Senator Fadahunsi Tells APC,” he described the comment as political and metaphorical and denied advocating violence or intimidation.

The senator also urged his supporters to maintain peace and allow voters to freely exercise their rights.

The Osun State Police Command subsequently invited Fadahunsi to clarify the remarks.

The invitation, dated August 11, directed him to appear before the State Criminal Investigation Department in Osogbo over statements the police described as potentially “threatening, inciting and intimidating”.

Fadahunsi honoured the invitation on Wednesday and was questioned by police for more than two hours before leaving the command.

The police said the invitation was a proactive measure intended to reduce political tension ahead of the election.

The petition comes as Osun voters prepare to elect their governor on Saturday, August 15, amid heightened political tensions and concerns over electoral violence.

Loading

Continue Reading

Headline

Ex-Minister Sylva’s Aide Breaks Silence On Link To Tinubu Coup Plot

Published

on

By Augustine Akhilomen

Chief Julius Bokoru, the Special Assistant on Media and Public Affairs to former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Chief Timipre Sylva, has questioned the circumstances surrounding reports linking his principal to an alleged plot against President Bola Tinubu’s administration.


Bokoru said the manner in which the allegations had been repeatedly reported raised serious questions about the sources of the information and the motive behind the continuous publication of the claims.

The aide spoke in a statement issued amid growing attention to reports concerning Sylva and an alleged plan to overthrow the Federal Government.

He said his comments should not be interpreted as an attempt to undermine investigative journalism or prevent the media from scrutinising public officials.

Rather, Bokoru urged journalists to examine the origin of information supplied to them, especially when the materials involve sensitive security investigations.

“Nigerian journalism has, at its best, played a courageous and indispensable role in holding governments, institutions and powerful individuals to account.”

He, however, said the reporting of the allegations against Sylva appeared to have moved beyond investigation into what he described as a repeated effort to establish one particular narrative.

“The allegations have been repeatedly serialised, repackaged and amplified in a manner that increasingly gives the impression of a deliberate campaign to cement a particular narrative in the public mind,” he stated.

Bokoru said he had not been able to establish contact with Sylva since the controversy started.


He nevertheless maintained that the absence of direct communication with his principal would not stop him from raising questions about the manner in which information concerning the former Bayelsa State governor was being released.

He particularly questioned the source and timing of documents reportedly used in some of the reports.

“Where are these materials coming from? Who is supplying them? Why are sensitive investigative documents appearing in carefully sequenced instalments?

“And why does virtually every new report seem calculated to reinforce the same conclusion about Sylva, even though the allegations have yet to be established in court?”

The development followed earlier reports that security operatives had raided Sylva’s Abuja residence while investigating an alleged coup plot.

Bokoru had previously confirmed that the residence was raided by individuals believed to be operatives of the Defence Headquarters.

He also said the operation caused considerable damage to the property. Sylva was outside Nigeria at the time, according to his aide.

Bokoru, however, has consistently denied that his principal had any involvement in a plan to remove Tinubu from office.


In his latest statement, he was more focused on the media coverage of the matter and the danger of presenting allegations as established facts.

“I will say plainly that the pattern of this coverage increasingly raises the uncomfortable question of whether some organisations are pursuing their own stories or, knowingly or otherwise, acting from someone else’s script,” he said.

He stressed that he was not accusing any media organisation of receiving instructions or funding from a particular person or group.

According to him, he had no evidence to make such an accusation.

His concern, he said, was whether journalists were independently verifying the information being handed to them before publication.

Bokoru also drew a distinction between an allegation contained in an investigative document and a finding that has been established through the courts.

“There is also a fundamental distinction that should never be blurred: an allegation is not evidence; an investigator’s theory is not a conviction; and a statement contained in an investigative file is not a judicial finding of guilt,” he said.

He therefore challenged authorities with evidence against Sylva to follow due process and present any prosecutable case before a court.


“If there are allegations, report them as allegations,” Bokoru insisted.

The aide further warned against what he described as the trial of individuals through the media.

He said continuous publication of unproven allegations could create a situation where public opinion becomes the judge, despite the absence of cross-examination and other safeguards available in a court of law.

“The more troubling possibility is that confidential investigative materials may be selectively finding their way into the media in order to shape public opinion,” he said.

Bokoru said media organisations should be careful not to become instruments for interests seeking to influence public perception.

He maintained that the responsibility of the press goes beyond obtaining exclusive information.


According to him, journalists must also establish the context, reliability and status of such information before presenting it to the public.


“Our journalists have fought too hard for the freedom to investigate power to become unwitting instruments of power,” he said.

The aide also acknowledged the right of the media to investigate Sylva and report developments surrounding the former minister.

However, he said that right should come with an obligation to clearly distinguish between verified facts, allegations and leaked materials.

Bokoru added, “If the evidence is solid, publish it. If it is an allegation, call it an allegation. If it is a leaked narrative, tell the public that it is a leaked narrative. But do not repeatedly dress accusation in the language of established fact.”

He warned that the repetition of an allegation could gradually create the impression that the claim had already been proven.

“There is a danger in allowing repetition to become a proof.”

Sylva, who is a former governor of Bayelsa State, has remained a prominent figure within the All Progressives Congress.

His aide has previously pointed to his support for Tinubu and the APC as evidence of his political alignment with the current administration.

Bokoru also recalled Sylva’s role in mobilising APC stakeholders in Bayelsa to endorse Tinubu.

He said the media should not allow itself to be used in political battles, regardless of who is providing the information.

Bokoru called for the allegations to be subjected to proper investigation and legal scrutiny rather than being repeatedly debated through media reports.

He said if the authorities have credible evidence, the appropriate step would be to present it through the proper legal process.

“Nigeria deserves a fearless press. But a fearless press must also be an independent press,” he said.

Loading

Continue Reading

Recent Posts




JOIN US ON FACEBOOK

&m

Trending